The Strategic Imperative: Assessing the Benefits of India’s Ban on Pakistani Social Media Influencers

I. Introduction:

The geopolitical landscape of South Asia has long been characterized by a complex and often fraught relationship between India and Pakistan. In recent years, the proliferation of digital media has added another layer to this dynamic, with social media platforms becoming significant avenues for shaping public opinion and exerting cross-border influence. The year 2025 witnessed a further escalation in tensions following a devastating terrorist attack in Pahalgam on April 22nd, which resulted in the tragic deaths of 26 civilians.¹ Initial reports indicated that the attackers primarily targeted Hindu tourists, and the responsibility for the attack was initially claimed by The Resistance Front (TRF), an organization believed to be an offshoot of the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba.¹ This act of violence was followed by India’s military response, Operation Sindoor, launched on May 7th, 2025, which involved strikes against alleged terrorist infrastructure within Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.⁴ In the immediate aftermath of these events, the Indian government made a significant decision to ban Pakistani social media influencers and media outlets within India.⁷ This move, citing legal requests and concerns over national security, followed a pattern of earlier restrictions on Pakistani YouTube channels accused of spreading provocative content.⁷ This report aims to analyze the potential benefits for India stemming from this ban on Pakistani social media influencers in the context of the Pahalgam attack and Operation Sindoor. The central research question guiding this analysis is: What are the potential advantages for India of prohibiting Pakistani social media influencers from operating within its digital space after these critical events? The objectives of this paper include examining the impact of the ban on the dissemination of anti-India narratives, the flow of financial resources, the strengthening of national security, and the promotion of India’s domestic digital economy. Understanding the implications of this ban is crucial given the increasing role of digital media in international relations and the ongoing complexities of the India-Pakistan dynamic, particularly concerning digital sovereignty and national security.

II. Curbing Anti-India Propaganda and Misinformation:

Social media platforms have become powerful tools in modern information warfare, capable of rapidly disseminating propaganda, misinformation, and biased narratives that can significantly impact national interests, especially during periods of heightened geopolitical tension.⁹ Following the Pahalgam terrorist attack, an intense information war unfolded on social media, with evidence suggesting coordinated efforts originating from Pakistani accounts aimed at discrediting the Indian state and mocking the tragedy.⁹ In this environment, popular Pakistani actors and influencers with substantial followings within India could inadvertently or intentionally become conduits for spreading content that fosters anti-India sentiment or contributes to social disharmony. The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Information Technology had previously voiced serious concerns regarding the role of certain social media influencers and entities in the aftermath of the Pahalgam attack.¹⁰ The committee noted that some of these entities appeared to be acting against India’s interests and had the potential to incite violence through their online content.¹⁰ This observation provided a formal basis for the government to consider stringent actions against such digital actors. By banning these influencers, the Indian government directly aimed to restrict the dissemination of content deemed provocative, communally sensitive, or based on false narratives.⁷ Reports indicated that the blocked YouTube channels and social media accounts had been involved in spreading such detrimental content against India.⁷ Furthermore, the digital landscape is increasingly challenged by the use of artificial intelligence to generate and propagate disinformation. The aftermath of the Pahalgam attack saw the emergence of AI-edited videos and deepfake tools being utilized in disinformation campaigns.⁹ Restricting the online presence of influential accounts, even if they are not the originators of such content, can help slow down the amplification and spread of these manipulated narratives. The ban, therefore, is not just about the specific content that individual influencers might create, but also about their broader potential to amplify anti-India narratives, regardless of the original source. Influencers with large audiences serve as critical nodes in the information network, and their engagement with or sharing of content can significantly expand the reach of potentially harmful information.

III. Severing Financial Links to Potential State or Non-State Actors:

Social media influencers derive income through various avenues, including brand endorsements, sponsored content, advertising revenue generated from their platforms, and collaborative projects.¹⁴ Evidence suggests that Pakistani actors and influencers, particularly those in the entertainment and lifestyle sectors, have enjoyed considerable popularity within India, translating into potentially significant financial gains from the Indian market.¹⁵ Top Pakistani celebrities had been at the forefront of high-profile collaborations with Indian and global brands, focusing on key consumer sectors like luxury, beauty, fashion, OTT platforms, and technology, specifically targeting the rapidly growing Indian consumer base.¹⁵ Actors like Fawad Khan, Hania Aamir, and Mahira Khan had endorsed major brands, indicating substantial financial stakes tied to their presence in the Indian market.¹⁵ A key argument supporting the ban is that the revenue earned by these Pakistani influencers from Indian audiences could indirectly contribute to the Pakistani economy. While the direct link to state or non-state actors might be difficult to ascertain, the concern remains that these financial flows could ultimately benefit entities potentially hostile to India. The ban has demonstrably disrupted marketing campaigns that featured Pakistani celebrities and were aimed at the Indian market, leading to reported losses for the brands involved.¹⁵ With the digital blackout of these influencers, brands that had previously invested in these collaborations faced a significant setback in their marketing strategies.¹⁵ Consequently, the ban could encourage both Indian and global brands to increasingly focus their investments on collaborations with Indian social media influencers. This shift in marketing expenditure could provide a significant boost to the domestic digital economy, fostering growth and creating more opportunities for Indian content creators and marketing agencies. The financial impact of the ban extends beyond the individual earnings of Pakistani influencers; it affects the broader influencer marketing ecosystem and has the potential to redirect substantial investments within India.

IV. Strengthening National Security Post-Terror Attack:

In the aftermath of the Pahalgam terrorist attack and the subsequent military response, Operation Sindoor, the ban on Pakistani social media influencers can be viewed as an effort to bolster national security by establishing a stronger sense of digital border security. It aims to limit the influence of individuals and entities originating from a country perceived by many in India as a source of terrorism. This action also likely resonates with the heightened sense of national security and public anger prevalent in India following the tragic events. The ban on social media influencers aligns with the earlier government decisions to block Pakistani YouTube channels and media outlets within India.⁷ These earlier actions were also predicated on concerns about national security and the spread of provocative content.⁷ This consistent approach indicates a comprehensive strategy by the Indian government to manage digital content originating from Pakistan. By restricting the platforms of popular Pakistani figures, the ban intends to prevent the subtle or overt promotion of narratives that could be interpreted as supportive of terrorism or hostile towards India. Furthermore, the ban can be understood as a symbolic act of retaliation in the digital domain, mirroring the military response of Operation Sindoor. It sends a strong message to Pakistan, underscoring India’s firm stance against cross-border terrorism and any perceived support for it, even if indirect through financial benefits to Pakistani public figures. This multi-pronged response, encompassing both military and digital measures, reflects India’s determination to counter perceived threats from Pakistan across all spheres.

V. Promoting Domestic Digital Content and Economy:

One of the potential benefits of banning Pakistani social media influencers is the likely shift in audience attention towards Indian content creators. With access to popular Pakistani influencers restricted, Indian audiences may increasingly consume content produced by domestic influencers, leading to greater visibility and influence for them. This increased viewership and engagement can translate into higher advertising revenue for Indian social media platforms and more lucrative brand collaborations for Indian influencers. The ban could therefore contribute to the development of a more self-reliant and nationally focused digital entertainment and information ecosystem within India. The absence of prominent Pakistani influencers in the Indian digital space might also create opportunities for emerging Indian talent to capture a larger share of the market and build a strong domestic fanbase. This fostering of local digital talent and platforms can strengthen India’s digital sovereignty and reduce reliance on foreign digital content, particularly from a geopolitically sensitive neighbor.

VI. Symbolic Assertion of National Sovereignty:

The decision to ban Pakistani social media influencers can be interpreted as a symbolic assertion of India’s national sovereignty in the digital realm. It demonstrates the government’s resolve to control its digital space and regulate the flow of information within its borders, especially when matters of national security are at stake. The ban also serves as a strong diplomatic and political message to Pakistan, signaling India’s firm stance against cross-border terrorism and any perceived indirect support through financial benefits to Pakistani public figures. It is worth noting that this action could also be seen as a response to past instances where Pakistan has imposed restrictions on Indian content or artists.¹⁶ For example, following India’s ban, Pakistan reportedly pulled Indian songs from its radio stations, highlighting a history of reciprocal actions in the cultural and digital domains.¹⁶ By limiting the presence of cultural figures from a rival nation, particularly in the sensitive context of recent terrorist attacks, the ban can symbolically reinforce a sense of national identity and unity within India. In an era of increasing digital interconnectedness, the ability of a nation-state to regulate its digital borders is becoming a crucial aspect of its sovereignty, and this ban reflects India’s exercise of this prerogative in response to a perceived threat.

VII. Addressing Concerns and Counterarguments:

While the ban on Pakistani social media influencers may offer certain benefits, it is important to acknowledge potential concerns and counterarguments. One key concern revolves around the infringement upon the freedom of expression, both for the influencers who are barred from reaching their Indian audience and for the Indian audience who are denied access to content they might wish to consume. Critics might argue that access to diverse cultural content, regardless of the creator’s nationality, is valuable and should not be restricted based on geopolitical tensions. Furthermore, the ban could be seen as negatively impacting cultural exchange and reducing opportunities for fostering understanding and goodwill between the people of India and Pakistan. Digital platforms have, in the past, served as a bridge for people-to-people contact, and restricting access could hinder these interactions. The long-term effectiveness of the ban is also questionable, as tech-savvy users may find ways to circumvent these restrictions through the use of Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) or other methods.¹⁷ Indeed, some Pakistani stars reacted to the ban by suggesting the use of VPNs to their Indian followers.¹⁷ There is also a risk of Pakistan taking further retaliatory measures against Indian digital content or influencers operating within its borders. Some argue that maintaining cultural ties and dialogue, even through digital platforms, might be a more constructive long-term approach than imposing bans, especially considering the limited economic impact of artistic exchanges.¹⁹ Blocking Pakistani artists might inadvertently benefit extremist elements within Pakistan who desire a deep divide between the two nations.²⁰ Therefore, while the ban might offer short-term benefits in terms of security signaling, it also raises important questions about fundamental freedoms, cultural engagement, and the practicalities of completely isolating the digital space.

VIII. Effectiveness of Similar Content Bans in Other Countries:

Examining the experiences of other countries with content and influencer bans can provide valuable context for evaluating the potential effectiveness of India’s actions. Internet censorship and social media bans are prevalent in various countries, including China, Russia, and Iran, often implemented for political, social, or security reasons.²² India itself had previously banned TikTok, and the United States has also considered similar measures.²⁶ The impact of India’s TikTok ban on influencers revealed a loss of income and a shift towards other platforms.²⁷ However, many creators struggled to regain the same level of reach and engagement.²⁷ Studies on the effectiveness of content bans in curbing misinformation and propaganda suggest that while they might have an immediate impact, these effects can be temporary and are often circumvented.²⁸ For instance, the EU’s ban on Russian state-led news outlets saw a reduction in pro-Russian slant, but the effect was short-lived.²⁸ Furthermore, such bans can have unintended consequences, potentially hindering technological development and harming domestic companies that rely on cross-border digital interactions.²⁹ These experiences suggest that while content and influencer bans might achieve specific short-term objectives, their long-term effectiveness is often limited, and they can come with their own set of challenges and unintended negative consequences.

IX. Conclusion:

The Indian government’s decision to ban Pakistani social media influencers following the Pahalgam terrorist attack and Operation Sindoor presents a multifaceted strategic response. The analysis indicates several potential benefits, including curbing the spread of anti-India propaganda and misinformation, severing financial links that could indirectly support hostile entities, strengthening national security in the immediate aftermath of a terror attack, promoting the growth of India’s domestic digital content creators and platforms, and symbolically asserting national sovereignty in the digital realm. However, this action is not without its limitations and potential drawbacks. Concerns regarding the infringement of freedom of expression, the negative impact on cross-border cultural exchange, the questionable long-term effectiveness of the ban in a technologically interconnected world, and the risk of reciprocal actions from Pakistan warrant careful consideration. Experiences from other countries with similar digital restrictions highlight that while such measures might offer immediate relief or signal a strong political stance, their long-term efficacy and broader consequences require ongoing evaluation. Further research could focus on the long-term impact of this ban on cross-border cultural interactions, the evolving strategies employed by both influencers and audiences to navigate such digital restrictions, and the overall effectiveness of digital censorship as a tool in managing complex geopolitical relationships like that between India and Pakistan.

Works cited

1. 2025 Pahalgam attack – Wikipedia, accessed on May 14, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_Pahalgam_attack
2. ‘Act of war’: What happened in Kashmir attack that killed 26 tourists? – Al Jazeera, accessed on May 14, 2025, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/4/23/act-of-war-what-happened-in-kashmir-attack-that-killed-26-tourists
3. Militants kill at least 26 tourists at a resort in Indian-controlled Kashmir – AP News, accessed on May 14, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/kashmir-tourist-attack-dc7067a18899d9e7ff7726d4e05982c3
4. 2025 India–Pakistan conflict – Wikipedia, accessed on May 14, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_India%E2%80%93Pakistan_conflict
5. Operation Sindoor: Know what India has achieved – DD News, accessed on May 14, 2025, https://ddnews.gov.in/en/operation-sindoor-know-what-india-has-achieved/
6. operation sindoor : indian armed forces carried out precision strike at terrorist camps – PIB, accessed on May 14, 2025, https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2127370
7. ‘This is because we …’ reads Instagram accounts of Mahira Khan, Hania Aamir, Ali Zafar and other Pakistani influencers after ban in India, accessed on May 14, 2025, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/technology/social/this-is-because-we-reads-instagram-accounts-of-mahira-khan-hania-aamir-ali-zafar-and-other-pakistani-influencers-after-ban-in-india/articleshow/120769817.cms
8. Hania Aamir, Mahira Khan, Ali Zafar banned on Instagram in India …, accessed on May 14, 2025, https://m.economictimes.com/magazines/panache/hania-aamir-mahira-khan-ali-zafar-banned-on-instagram-in-india-after-pahalgam-attack-full-details-inside/articleshow/120769941.cms
9. Weaponising the Narrative: Social Media Propaganda post-Pahalgam Attack, accessed on May 14, 2025, https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/weaponising-the-narrative-social-media-propaganda-post-pahalgam-attack
10. Rumours of Instagram Ban in India Amid Geopolitical Tensions Are False – FACTLY, accessed on May 14, 2025, https://factly.in/rumours-of-instagram-ban-in-india-amid-geopolitical-tensions-are-false/
11. FACT CHECK: Has Govt of India Banned Instagram in May 2025 amid Rising India–Pakistan Tensions? – YouTube, accessed on May 14, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvgMbJSMs2A
12. Govt to ban social media influencers for anti-national content, flags …, accessed on May 14, 2025, https://www.livemint.com/news/pahalgam-terror-attack-india-pakistan-social-media-influencers-to-be-banned-for-anti-national-content-modi-govt-11746459282600.html
13. Parliamentary panel seeks action against ‘anti-national’ influencers, platforms – India Today, accessed on May 14, 2025, https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/parliamentary-panel-action-plan-against-anti-national-influencers-social-media-platforms-2720058-2025-05-05
14. Inside scoop on influencer earnings: Niche, negotiation, and ROI – The Financial Express, accessed on May 14, 2025, https://www.financialexpress.com/business/brandwagon-inside-scoop-on-influencer-earnings-niche-negotiation-and-roi-3777842/
15. Operation Sindoor: Instagram profiles of Hania Aamir, Fawad Khan, Mahira Khan blocked, accessed on May 14, 2025, https://www.exchange4media.com/marketing-news/operation-sindoor-instagram-profiles-of-hania-aamir-fawad-khan-mahira-khan-blocked-143312.html
16. After India puts ban on Pakistani artists, Youtube channels and Instagram accounts of actors like Hania Aamir, Pakistan pulls off Indian songs from its radio stations | Hindi Movie News, accessed on May 14, 2025, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/news/after-india-puts-ban-on-pakistani-artists-youtube-channels-and-instagram-accounts-of-actors-like-hania-aamir-pakistan-pulls-off-indian-songs-from-its-radio-stations/articleshow/120824055.cms
17. Pakistani stars react with sass, jokes, and VPN recommendations after social media accounts banned in India – Celebrity – Dawn Images, accessed on May 14, 2025, https://images.dawn.com/news/1193576/pakistani-stars-react-with-sass-jokes-and-vpn-recommendations-after-social-media-accounts-banned-in-india
18. Will the ban of dramas on Indian YouTube channels affect the stardom and popularity of actors? : r/PAKCELEBGOSSIP – Reddit, accessed on May 14, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/PAKCELEBGOSSIP/comments/1kautb5/will_the_ban_of_dramas_on_indian_youtube_channels/
19. Banning Pakistani artists achieves nothing substantial other than feeding jingoism. Change my mind! – Reddit, accessed on May 14, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/IndianHipHopHeads/comments/1kcte6c/banning_pakistani_artists_achieves_nothing/
20. India’s crackdown on Pak’s soft power: From Hania Aamir to Ali Zafar; artists whose Instagram handles are ‘restricted’ | Today News – Mint, accessed on May 14, 2025, https://www.livemint.com/news/trends/india-pakistan-artists-instagram-restricted-mahira-khan-atif-aslam-hania-aamir-ali-sethi-pahalgam-terrorist-attack-war-11746067295495.html
21. Banning Pakistani artists in Bollywood: Why did India give up its massive soft power leverage? – Scroll.in, accessed on May 14, 2025, https://scroll.in/reel/819780/banning-pakistani-artists-in-bollywood-why-did-india-give-up-its-massive-soft-power-leverage
22. Global Censorship: Banned Social Media & Internet Restrictions – SafeDNS Blog, accessed on May 14, 2025, https://blog.safedns.com/understanding-censorship-exploring-banned-social-media-content-filtering-and-internet-access-restrictions-worldwide/
23. Internet Censorship in 2025: The Impact of Internet Restrictions | Security.org, accessed on May 14, 2025, https://www.security.org/vpn/internet-censorship/
24. It’s Not Just Autocracies – Democracies Also Censor the Internet – CEPA, accessed on May 14, 2025, https://cepa.org/article/its-not-just-autocracies-democracies-also-censor-the-internet/
25. Countries With the Most—and Least—Digital Freedom – Beyond Identity, accessed on May 14, 2025, https://www.beyondidentity.com/resource/countries-with-the-most–and-least–digital-freedom
26. TikTok ban could leave several influencers broke-See who’s losing $10K a month!, accessed on May 14, 2025, https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/global-trends/tiktok-ban-could-leave-several-influencers-broke-see-whos-losing-10k-a-month/articleshow/117338395.cms
27. What Happens to Influencers After a Country Bans TikTok? – GovTech, accessed on May 14, 2025, https://www.govtech.com/policy/what-happens-to-influencers-after-a-country-bans-tiktok
28. Censorship to defend democracy | CEPR, accessed on May 14, 2025, https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/censorship-defend-democracy
29. Unintended consequences of banning social media apps | News & Information | University of Washington Tacoma, accessed on May 14, 2025, https://www.tacoma.uw.edu/news/unintended-consequences-banning-social-media-apps

Read also: Memes a Digital Weapon – Research Paper